Skip to Main Content

Writing Resources

This page details the formatting and requirements for abstracts that must follow the guidelines presented in the Saybrook Handbook of Format​ & Style​​. These guidelines​ apply to dissertations, but they may also apply to master's projects and theses. For standard student papers, check our webpage Introduction vs. Abstract​

Basic Formatting

Here are the basic formatting requirements for abstracts. For a visual representation, please refer to the Dissertation Template.​​

  • Paginate beginning with page ii and number subsequent pages sequentially.
  • Double space all lines of the abstract, except for lines including the title of the work.
  • Include the word Abstract centered at the top of the page.
  • 2 double-spaced lines below the word Abstract, the title of the work is written centered and in all caps.
  • 1 double-spaced line below the title, write the author's name
  • 1 double-spaced line below the author's name, write Saybrook University.
  • 2 double-spaced lines below the title, begin writing the text.
  • The text of the abstract (not including the heading information detailed above) must meet one of the following word limits
    • 350 words for dissertations (extended to 400 for mixed methods)
    • 150 words for theses
  • Include citations for citable statements and information.
  • Embed key words in the text of the abstract. Do not list them separately at the end.

Content Outline

​​Empirical studies should contain four paragraphs using the outline presented below. Non-empirical studies should follow this format where possible and modify the format with the consent of your committee.

  • Paragraph 1: Overview
    • Situate the research project in the subject domain.
    • Convey the purpose, focus, and problem area of the study.
    • Provide the research question(s) for the study.
    • Discuss the literature (major links to related research, or its absence).
  • Paragraph 2: Methodology
    • Describe the method.
    • Explain the rationale for selecting the method.
    • List key demographic characteristics of research participants or other data sources.
    • Include key terms regarding the nature of the data, sampling, research design, instrumentation, and data collection.
  • Paragraph 3: Findings
    • Present the chief findings directly relevant to the research purpose and question.
    • Include terminology to indicate the form of data analysis procedure used.
    • Include supplemental findings considered important for cross-referencing.
  • Paragraph 4: Significance & Implications
    • Communicate the meaning, significance, contribution, and implications of the research.
    • Provide suggestions for further study.

Note that, for dissertations, paragraphs 1 & 2 can be written in the during the proposal phase while paragraphs 3 & 4 should be written prior to the final oral defense.

Abstract Checklist

This Abstract Review Checklist is provided on page 18 of the Saybrook​ Handbook of Format & Style​. For dissertations, this checklist must be complete and approved by a Saybrook editor before submission to the Registrar's Office for publication.

Formatting

  • Is it within the word count limit?
    • MA=150
    • PHD=350 (Mixed-Methods=400)
  • ​Is it double-spaced?
  • ​Is it in Times New Roman or similar serif font?
  • ​Is it 12-point?
  • Are paragraphs indented?
  • Is the heading spaced correctly?
  • Is the title capitalized?

Content

  • ​Is the purpose, problem, or research question clearly stated?
  • Are key concepts explained?
  • Are the major links to existing research identified?
  • Is the method(s) and rationale for its selection provided?
  • Is the data source identified?
  • Is the nature of the data identified?
  • Is the method of data analysis identified?
  • ​Are the results & conclusions clearly stated?
  • Is the significance & contribution of the study clearly stated?
  • Are reference citations used for citable statements and information?
  • Is there a correct use of past and present tense?
  • Is it coherent, concise, & specific?
  • Does it report rather than evaluate the essential elements of the study?
  • Are key terms embedded in the text, not listed separately?